As a part of the Rule of Law Project, Ramya and I were assigned the task of doing something which had never been done before. 24 High Courts, about 2000 different case types (each case is classified into a particular type by the Court.

In the process of unfurling our research method at The Rule of Law project it has been important to examine what data can help us frame information that can answer the question of what “delay” and “pendency” really means, outside of the anecdotal narratives that get thrown up both in the media and in reports of and by the courts themselves.

Just last week, the mother of all delayed cases – the Disproportionate Assets Case against former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, under the Prevention of Corruption Act – has come to a head.

DAKSH and India Together (www.indiatogether.org) have instituted the DAKSH-India Together Fellowship to encourage data journalism centered around elections.

In election season, everybody is a pundit and has a view about the factors that will determine the outcome of the election. The diversity of the electorate ensures that everyone can get their voice in and can claim credit for predicting something right! One of the all-time favourites during election is the argument around caste and its importance.

Caveat emptor: I wish I knew. And so do hundreds of wannabe-MPs right now, I’m sure. Karthik Shashidhar’s very interesting analysis of our data in Mint earlier this week documents some of the reasons we heard from nearly 2.5 lakh people across the country.

This post is specifically for people who are looking at either the detailed survey data or at least the Constituency-level summaries of our data. So if you’re not one of those serious data-monkeys, begone!

The DAKSH-ADR Survey 2014 reached over 2 lakh respondents across the country from various backgrounds. We asked people to identify and rate the issues that are important to them when they vote in an election.

With the MP survey results coinciding with my son’s exams, I guess it’s not surprising that my thoughts turn to how our MPs have scored :). And overall, I must say it’s a pretty poor showing across the board.

“You talked to two-and-a-half lakh people? Are you serious? Why?” “You did this offline? Using paper and pen? OMG! Why not online?